Summary: The NFL passer rating can be considered to be the sum of two adjusted yards per attempt formulas, one cast in units of yards and the other using catches as a measure of yards. We show, in this article, how to build such a model by construction.
My previous article has led to some very nice emails back and forth with the Pro Football Focus folks. In thinking about ways to explain the complexities of the original NFL formula, it occurred to me that there are two yardage terms because the NFL passer rating can be regarded as the sum of two adjusted yards per attempt formulas. Once you begin thinking in those terms, it’s not all that hard to derive an NFL style formula.
Our basic formula will be
<1> AYA = (yards + α*TDs – β*Ints)/Attempts
The Hidden Game of Football’s new passer rating is a formula of this kind, with α = 10 and β = 45. Pro Football Reference’s AY/A has an α value of 20 and a β value of 45. On this blog, we’ve shown that these formulas are tightly associated with scoring models.
Using the relationship Yards = YPC*Catches, we then get
<2> AYA = (YPC*Catches + α*TDs – β*Ints)/Attempts
Since the point of the exercise is to end up with an NFL-esque formula, we’ll multiply both sides of equation <2> with 20/YPC.
<3> 20*AYA/YPC = (20*Catches + 20*α*TDs/YPC – 20*β*Ints/YPC)/Attempts
Now, adding equations <1> and <3>, we now have
<4> (20/YPC + 1)*AYA = (20*Catches + Yards + [20/YPC + 1]*α*TDs – [20/YPC + 1]*β*Ints)/Attempts
and if we now define RANKING as the left hand side of equation <4>, A as [20/YPC + 1]*α and B as [20/YPC + 1]*β, formula <4> becomes
RANKING = (20*Catches + Yards + A*TDs – B*Ints)/Attempts
Look familiar? This is the same form as the NFL passer rating, when stripped of its multiplier and the additive coefficient. To complete the derivation, multiply both sides of the equation by 100/24 and then add 50/24 to both sides. You end up with
RANKING = 100/24*[(20*Catches + Yards + A*TDs – B*Ints)/Attempts] + 50/24
which is the THGF form of the NFL passer rating, when A = 80 and B = 100.
If YPC equals 11.4, then the conversion coefficient (20/YPC + 1) becomes 2.75. The relationship between the scoring model coefficients α and β and the NFL style passer model coefficients A and B become
A = 2.75*α
B = 2.75*β
Just for the sake of argument, we’re going to set alpha to 25, pretty close to the 23.3 that we get from a linearized Brian Burke model, and beta we’ll set to 60, 6.7 yards less than the 66.7 yards we calculated from the linearized Brian Burke scoring model. using those values, we get 68.75 for A and 165 for B. Rounding the first value to the nearest 10 and rounding B down a little, our putative NFL style model becomes:
RANKING = (20*Catches + Yards + 70*TDs – 160*Ints)/Attempts
Note that formulas <1> and <2> do not contribute equally to the final sum. Equation <2> is weighted by the factor (20/YPC)/(20/YPC + 1) and equation <1> is weighted by the factor 1/(20/YPC + 1). When YPC is about 11.4 yards, then the contribution of equation <2> to the total is about 63.6% and equation <1> adds about 35.4% to the total. Complaints that the NFL formula is heavily driven by completion percentage are correct.
Using the values α = 20 and β = 45, which are values found in Pro Football Reference’s version of adjusted yards per attempt, we then get values of A and B that are 55 and 123.75 respectively. Rounding down to the nearest 10, and plugging these values into the NFL style formula yields
RANKING = (20*Catches + Yards + 50*TDs – 120*Ints)/Attempts
Note that the two models in question have smaller A values than the core of the traditional NFL model (80) and larger B values than the traditional NFL model (100). This probably reflects the times. The 1970s were a defensive era. It was harder to score then. As it becomes harder to score, the magnitude of the TD term should increase. TD/Interception ratios were smaller in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s. As interceptions were more a part of the job, perhaps their effect wasn’t as valued when the original NFL formula was constructed.
Afterward: in many respects, this article is just the reverse of the arguments here. However, the proof by construction yields some useful formulas, and in my opinion, is easier to explain.
Update: more exhaustive derivation of the NFL passer rating.